Book Report on Anthropology of Globalization by Lewellen

Posting-wk-9 It was a long, difficult reading of a technical-term-loaded text, but immensely enjoyed! So much more to be said, but I stop here. I look forward to your lively, insightful interactions and discussions. Major Learnings Chapters 1-2 o Contemporary globalization is an on-going process of not just economic flows, but also cultural flows—the increasing flow of trade, finance, culture, ideas, and people brought about by the technology of communication and travel and by the worldwide spread of neoliberal capitalism†¦ (7). o Globalization is a reality, as well as regionalization and localization. Neoliberal capitalism has a global dominance; regionalism, localization, and globalization form a single, unified system†¦show more content†¦o Sometimes these changes are brought about by discourse, which it the deliberate control of thoughts and actions in a particular place or period (73). However, we even need to deconstruct development discourse. Developers and anthropologists may carry hegemonic philosophy, power discourse and ideology in their approaches to development (75). The dominant discourse must be deconstructed to reveal inherent presuppositions and assumptions, especially those that assert power and control on others (41). o Development transforms women in very different way (e.g., in labor). Development programs often fail to notice local discourses (85). Women need a voice and â€Å"some control over their lives and communities† (Amen!). Missiological Implications 1. The degree of globalization may vary from culture to culture. Globalization is a global, cultural phenomenon. As anthropology practicing missiologists, our tasks of mission must include a study of the history of globalization in the field of mission in which we opearte. Globalization shapes and reshapes culture and consumerism affects every fabric of life in that culture. In order to be a change agent to bring about culture change, we must know what â€Å"culture† we are talking about. 2. Lewellen suggests that contemporary cultural anthropologist should look for not only differences but also similarities, not

The Battle of Stalingrad and the Battle of Normandy Essay

The Battle of Stalingrad and the Battle of Normandy were two vital battles in World War II. Stalingrad was the site of a critical WWII Soviet victory that terminated Germany’s advance to the east. Peaceful Normandy took it’s place in history as the starting point in the triumphant march across Europe. Both these intense events were extremely significant in the outcome of the second world war. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;After the Germans failed to win the war totally in 1941, they decided to start a fresh effort, and hoped that this would lead to victory. This effort eventually led to the city of Stalingrad in 1942. Different from the the three pronged attack of the previous year, this one had two attack directions. One from Kharkov to†¦show more content†¦Before this, there was a huge aerial bombardment that destroyed most of the outer suburbs, thus pushing back the Russians to their middle line of defense. Because of the German bombing, the rubble which had accumulated provided easily defensible positions. The horribly inefficient Russians were now able to maintain some sort of defensive line, however, foolish charges into enemy lines only achieved marginal success at times. When it came right down to it, the Russians had sized the battle down to house to house fighting, a style of combat which, although the Germans could perform, would not allow them to take advantage of their superior equipment. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;By the end of the first week of September, Hitler realized that his offensive was not cutting through the enemy as promised. Despite renewed major pushes by the attackers on October 14th, and November 11th, the defense line, (which was now isolated into three sections) was never reduced. Angering Hitler, he quickly replaced some of his generals. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Meanwhile, while all this bungling, and well, embarrassment went on, Soviet staff was preparing for a flanking battle, which would envelope 6th Army into a large pocket, and bring about its total destruction. General Zhukov and C. General AlexanderShow MoreRelatedThe Bombing Of Pearl Harbor1173 Words   |  5 Pages Though the war was bloody and brutal for everyone involved, the upper hand belonged to the Axis powers throughout the majority of the war. Three of the most pivotal times in World War II were the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the Battle of Stalingrad and the Battle of Normandy. All three of these points in the war either brought something new into the war or changed the pecking order between rivaling countries. The first major turning point in World War II was the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor.Read MoreThe Invasion Of France During World War II2549 Words   |  11 Pagesinvasion, which took place on the beaches of Normandy was actually a diversion, and he believed the attacks would actually occur at Pas-de-Calais. Afterwards, in June 6, 1944 the Allies started Operation Overlord with the attack against the Nazi-occupied France above the beaches of Normandy. (Unit 5) Even though casualties were inevitable in both sides, Operation Overlord was effective as the Allies were victorious in this battle. As a result, the Normandy Landings became one of the most important daysRead MoreD Day During World War II1852 Words   |  8 Pagesyour fellow soldiers. Events similar to these were experienced by the brave Allied soldiers who partook in The Battle of Normandy, also known as D-Day. It marked the turning point of World War II in Europe and although there were other pivotal battles in Europe , Middle East and North Africa like Stalingrad, Tobruk, and the Battle of the Bulge, none matched its importance. No single battle was more significant to the Allied victory over Germany and the future of post war Western Europe than D-Day.Read MoreThe Events Of The World War I1455 Words   |  6 Pagesthings that led to the success of the Allies in World War 1. It did not only allow them the start the liberation of Eastern Europe but also reach Berlin to end the reign of the Nazis and Adolf Hitler over Europe. However there are other battles (Stalingrad, the Battle of Britain etc.) that could have been just as significant as D-Day. From the beginning of the Allied planning the collectively realised that it would not be easy for them to land on France and therefor it would be incredibly significantRead MoreWorld War Ii Was A Global War That Lasted From 1939 To1236 Words   |  5 Pagesleaders surrendered. The rapid fall of France astonished the world. Roosevelt answered Winston Churchill request for help by increasing military shipments to Great Britain and by â€Å"promising to provide all possible aid to the Allies short of war†. In the battle of Britain, Adolf Hitler had planned the invasion of Great Britain and sought to destroy Britain’s Royal Air Force. In July and August of 1940, the German Air Force Luftwaffe launch day and night bombing raids against military targets across southeastRead MoreWorld War II1478 Words   |  6 Pagesend in 1945, the battles between the Allied and Axis powers were violent and caused great destruction. It became a world dispute after the attack on Pearl Harbo r. From then on, countries such as the United States, France, Germany, Japan, the Soviet Union, and many others fought vigorously until a victory was achieved. World War II officially began after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and the United States declared war. The war was made up of a series of major events such as the Battle of El Alamein, theRead MoreGerman Blitzkreig Essay1161 Words   |  5 Pagesback to the Rhine River at a rate of 40 miles per day. The blitzkrieg at the beginning of the war doomed Hitler at the end. Blitzkrieg tactics gave Hitler an overwhelming amount of confidence that made him send troops out ill prepared for long battles, and it cost him greatly. Also, with blitzkrieg, Hitler gained territory too fast in the beginning to set up ample defenses, which left huge, undefended gaps in his territory ultimately leading to his defeat. Blitzkrieg, or â€Å"Lightning Warfare†Read MoreD Day During World War II1319 Words   |  6 PagesD-Day During World War II (1939-1945), D-Day, or the Battle of Normandy, was the turning point in the Allied attempt to liberate Western Europe from Nazi control. The invasion involved 326,000 British, American, and Canadian troops spread among five beaches. The Allies were victorious due to Nazi mistakes. Hitler, believing the attack was simply a diversion to distract the Germans from an attack north of the Seine River, withheld reinforcements and support from armored units. This gave the AlliesRead MoreWorld War I And The War II1518 Words   |  7 PagesWorld War II was a war that ended in much tragedy. There were over 60 million casualties. Throughout World War II there was how it started, the Nazi Regime, and some of the major battles. Much of the war was about the Germans bringing together a group of people called the Nazis. They were under the rule of Adolf Hitler. There were two groups fighting against each other: the Axis powers and the Allied powers. The Axis powers consisted of Japan, Italy, and Germany. The Allied powers were GreatRead MoreThe Military Units And Operators Emotions And Mental Health, And Understanding The Purpose Of Nationalism Socialism1575 Words   |  7 Pagesof fighting for National Socialism. The only factor left to fight for their friends next to them fighting. (Notes-w13) Then the Battle of Stalingrad was the breaking point for the majority of German soldiers. This battle showed that the Nazis did not choose to spare resources away from The Final Solution. The German 6th army was surrounded around the city of Stalingrad by the Russians. The Nazi belief of always fighting or the struggle ended here because soldiers in the field, officers and enlist

Henrietta Lacks free essay sample

Racism is immortal just like Henrietta’s cells it will always be around. People would do anything to be the first to discover something. At the end of the day it’s all about the money. The Mississippi appendectomies and the Tuskegee experiments were similar in the way that the government forced treatment upon minorities without consent. Henrietta’s case was different than Mississippi and Tuskegee because the doctor in Johns Hopkins didn’t experiment on her actual body but on her cells without consent. Henrietta’s case the Tuskegee experiments and the Mississippi Appendectomies are all different cases in different locations but serve the same purpose which is to take advantage of poor and uneducated minorities to further medical research. The Tuskegee Experiments and the Mississippi Appendectomies were both horrible cases and dealt with lots of racism and ignorance towards people who didn’t know any better. The purpose of The Tuskegee experiments was to see how syphilis affected blacks as opposed to whites. We will write a custom essay sample on Henrietta Lacks or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The treatment was to basically come in get injected with syphilis if you didn’t already have and the doctors would watch how you die. The people in these experiments were poor and uneducated black males who were coned into giving their life away. The doctors in this experiment lured the test subjects in the saying they were getting treated for â€Å"Bad Blood†. These racist and disturbing experiments lasted for 40 years between 1932-1972. The purpose of the Mississippi Appendectomies was to sterilize America of bad genes meaning anyone women who was mentally challenge, a criminal, Black, Alcoholic, etc†¦ would get sterilized so they couldn’t reproduce anymore. Doctors figured that in order to stop mentally challenged blacks alcoholics etc†¦ from walking this earth is to sterilize them and make sure their genes don’t flow in the gene pool. The treatment for these appendectomies was horrible it was just blacks that were treated it also Indians and poor whites. The test subjects were all sterilized against their will and without their knowing. These appendectomies were racist and cruel. More than half of the women in Mississippi were sterilized. These treatments lasted for about 33 years between 1930s and 1963. Henrietta Lacks case was different than Mississippi and Tuskegee in some ways. In Henrietta’s case the doctors took her cells from her cervix but like in the Mississippi and Tuskegee cases they took them without Henrietta’s permission and launched a multimillion-dollar medical industry after she died. The purpose of taking Henrietta’s cells was to just run a couple tests until they died but they ended up living and growing. Instead of telling Henrietta and her family what they have been doing the doctors kept the discovery to themselves. When the discovery of the immortal cells because known every doctor got their hands on them and started running experiments on them, sending the cells to space, running test on the cells to find a cure to aids and cervical cancer etc†¦ Racism wasn’t far from this case the doctor in Henrietta’s case figured that telling her what they were doing would only confuse her and her family even more so they just figure to not tell her or her family at all. This case started in 1951 and the research on the cells still goes on till the present. Racism hovers of this country and is always in the backs of everyone’s minds. Henrietta’s case the Tuskegee experiments and the Mississippi Appendectomies are all different cases in different locations but serve the same purpose which is to take advantage of poor and uneducated minorities to further medical research. In Tuskegee doctors took advantage of uneducated black males to find an answer to a question. The Mississippi appendectomies sterilized innocent uneducated and poor females because the government was trying to wipe out â€Å"bad â€Å"genes† and in the Henrietta lacks case doctors took her cells without consent, found out they were immortal and launched and multimillion-dollar medical industry. In the end it is indeed all about the money.